June 30, 2016 7 Comments
In EWD1300, Edsger W. Dijkstra wrote:
even if you have only 60 readers, it pays to spend an hour if by doing so you can save your average reader a minute.
He wrote this as the justification for the mathematical notations that he introduced and as an ode to the art of definition. But any writer should heed this aphorism. Recently, I finished reading Algorithms to Live By by Brian Christian and Tom Griffiths. In the conclusion of their book, they gave a unifying name to the sentiment that Dijkstra expresses above: computational kindness.
As computer scientists, we recognise that computation is costly. Processing time is a limited resource. Whenever we interact with others, we are sharing in a joint computational process, and we need to be mindful of when we are not carrying our part of the processing burden. Or worse yet, when we are needlessly increasing that burden and imposing it on our interlocutor. If you are computationally kind then you will be respectful of the cognitive problems that you force others to solve.
I think this is a great observation by Christian and Griffiths. In this post, I want to share with you some examples of how certain systems — at the level of the individual, small group, and society — are computationally kind. And how some are cruel. I will draw on examples from their book, and some of my own. They will include, language, bus stops, and the revelation principle in algorithmic game theory.
Read more of this post